DOL Issues Guidance on FMLA Leave When Travelling to Medical Appointments
The federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) has long allowed eligible employees to take leave to attend qualifying medical appointments. Earlier this year, the federal Department of Labor's (DOL) Wage and Hour Division issued an Opinion Letter confirming that employees may use FMLA leave for both the medical appointment and the time reasonably necessary to travel to and from that medical appointment.
The DOL Opinion Letter addressed a question about an employee requesting intermittent FMLA leave to attend medical appointments for their own serious health condition. The employee provided their employer with a medical certification which indicated that the medical appointments would occur once per month and last for 45 minutes.
The medical certification lacked any indication about the amount of travel time required to attend the medical appointments, but the employee told their employer that they needed one hour to travel to or from their medical appointments.
The DOL concluded that this travel time would also qualify for FMLA leave.
Generally speaking, the FMLA provides eligible employees with up to 12 work weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave in a 12-month period for the employee's own serious health condition or to care for a qualifying family member, such as a parent, child, or spouse, with a serious health condition.
A "serious health condition" is an illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that involves inpatient care or continuing treatment by a healthcare provider.
The FMLA provides job-protected leave for medical appointments, such as those related to the diagnosis, monitoring, addressing, or treating of an employee's or their qualifying family member's serious health condition.
In its Opinion Letter, the DOL reasoned that since FMLA-qualifying medical treatment often cannot occur without travel to the medical provider's location, such travel must therefore be considered "part and parcel" of that medical treatment. Accordingly, the DOL concluded that such travel time would also be designated as FMLA leave.
The DOL Opinion Letter provided an example where the employee's 30 minutes of travel time to a medical appointment, and the time at the medical appointment, during the employee's scheduled workday qualified as FMLA leave.
Not only does this example illustrate the topic of travel time, but it also serves as a reminder to employers that even though the total amount of FMLA leave is stated in workweeks, employers should not forget that FMLA leave can be taken in smaller increments.
Employers should have procedures in place for providing and tracking an employee's use of FMLA leave, even leave taken in smaller time increments.
In the initial question presented to the DOL, the medical certification lacked any mention of travel time.
The DOL explained that a medical certification need not explicitly indicate the amount of travel time since the FMLA does not require a health care provider to furnish such information. Employers should not deny FMLA leave requests, or leave for the eligible travel time, just because the travel time is not explicitly indicated on a medical certification.
The DOL also provided helpful guidance for minimizing the potential misuse of FMLA leave for unrelated travel time. The Opinion Letter indicated that only the portion of the employee's absence which is attributable to the qualifying medical treatment and the associated travel would be covered FMLA leave.
The DOL stated that FMLA-protected leave for travel time does not include travel to or from, or stops for, activities unrelated to obtaining medical care and treatment. The Opinion Letter provided a hypothetical example of a parent ineligible for FMLA leave for the travel time to accompany their child, who has a chronic serous health condition but does not need care, during a school band trip since that leave is unrelated to the child's serious health condition.
While opinion letters do not carry precedential weight like statutes or regulations, they nevertheless may be a helpful resource for HR professionals and employers.
The Family and Medical Leave Act provides job-protected leave for medical appointments, such as those related to the diagnosis, monitoring, addressing, or treating of an employee's or their qualifying family member's serious health condition. Following this recent opinion letter, employers should consider evaluating their FMLA leave policies and procedures regarding travel to and from medical appointments. California employers should also keep in mind that the DOL Opinion Letter only addressed travel to medical appointments with respect to the federal FMLA, and made no mention of the California Family Rights Act ("CFRA").
While the federal FMLA and the CFRA both provide job-protected leave and are similar in many respects, they are also different in others. Employers should consult with their HR department and/or legal counsel should they have questions about providing employees with leave related to travel to qualifying medical appointments.
Bradley Levang is an attorney with the Fenton & Keller law firm. This article is intended to address topics of general interest and should not be construed as legal advice. For more information, please visit www.fentonkeller.com.
Reminders For Vacation Policies
Question: I started a new business and have many questions about vacation for employees. Is this required? Can I implement a “use it or lose it” policy? Can I control and limit the employees’ vacation and policy structure? Can I advance vacation hours to employees? Can employees share vacation?
Answer:
Vacation Benefits Are Not Required
In California, employers are not required to provide paid or unpaid vacation benefits. However, if an employer chooses to voluntarily offer these benefits, the employer must follow strict rules on how a vacation policy may be structured and implemented. For example, employers cannot adopt “use it or lose it” policies, cannot impose an unreasonable “cap” on vacation accrual, and must pay out any accrued and unused vacation hours upon separation of employment. These restrictions and some general information regarding vacation policies are summarized below.
“Use it or Lose it” Policy
The California Supreme Court in Suastez v. Plastic Dress–Up Co. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 774, held that vacation pay is a type of wage or deferred compensation for services performed that vests throughout the course of employment. This means that accrued vacation hours are “wages” that cannot be forfeited if they are not used. Accordingly, a policy that provides for the forfeiture of vacation pay that is not used by a specified date (“use it or lose it”) is an illegal policy under California law and will not be recognized by the Labor Commissioner. However, as discussed below, the employer may reasonably limit and control the vacation policy’s structure and benefits before they vest.
Employer’s Right to Structure Vacation Policy and Control Before Benefit Vests
Although employers cannot require forfeiture of already vested vacation, employers still have broad discretion to control the mechanics of their vacation policies. Courts have recognized that employers may impose reasonable accrual caps, require waiting periods before vacation begins to accrue, and limit and control the vacation scheduling at a particular time and amount. For example, an employer may choose to implement a reasonable cap such as two times the annual accrual. This prevents an employee from saving up and accruing an indefinite amount of vacation. An employer may also choose to prevent employees from taking vacations during certain busy months. Moreover, an employer may provide different vacation accruals to different categories of employees. For example, an employer may provide more vacation to long-term employees and less vacation to newer employees or seasonal employees. These are permissible and critical tools to help small businesses limit their vacation policy liability.
Advance on Unearned Vacation
Employers may choose to advance vacation hours to employees before it has been earned. However, this practice may create risk because vacation pay vests only as labor is performed. If employment terminates before the employee earns sufficient vacation to offset the advance, recovering the unearned balance may conflict with California wage protections that prevent employers from deducting amounts from an employee’s final paycheck. Employers who choose to implement a policy that allows a vacation advance should ensure that all aspects of the policy comply with applicable wage and hour laws.
Share Vacation to Others
California law does not expressly authorize the sharing or donating of vested vacation time. Because accrued vacation is treated as wages, any leave-sharing program must be carefully structured to avoid violating wage assignment restrictions and strict requirements for IRS special tax treatment. As a result, implementing vacation-sharing programs could create complex legal and compliance issues, including administrative burdens, privacy concerns, potential discrimination claims, and cash flow implications.
Employers who wish to provide vacation benefits to employees should contact their HR consultant or labor counsel to ensure the policy’s terms and implementation comply with these rules.
Congratulations to Elizabeth R. Leitzinger
Everyone at Fenton & Keller extends our heartfelt congratulations to Elizabeth R. Leitzinger on her appointment to the Monterey County Superior Court. Elizabeth’s dedication to the law, her professionalism, and her commitment to our community made a lasting impact on our firm, our clients, and all who had the privilege of working alongside her. We are incredibly proud of this well-deserved honor and wish Judge Leitzinger every success as she begins this remarkable new chapter of public service.
Employment Law Seminar: Employee Leaves of Absence
Fenton & Keller invites you to attend an in-person employment law seminar focused on employee leaves of absence presented by Bradley J. Levang, Esq. and Alyssa Carbonel Matsuhara, Esq.
This seminar is designed for business owners, human resource professionals, payroll managers, and others responsible for personnel matters. Whether you are experienced or a novice, this presentation seeks to inform you about California employee leave fundamentals, including employee eligibility, documentation, timing, how leaves may interact, and managing employee leaves.
Topics will include:
- An overview employee leaves of absence applicable to California employers.
- Discussion of numerous leaves, including the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), pregnancy-related leaves (pregnancy disability leave, Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), baby bonding), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), crime victims leave, paid sick leave, and more.
- Informing employees about leaves.
- Common compliance challenges and how to minimize them.
- Identifying ad designating overlapping and consecutive leaves.
- Documenting requests, denials, and timing of leaves.
- Managing leaves, including the employee’s return-to-work, and addressing potential issues.
Event Details
Date: Thursday, September 24, 2026
Check-in: 8:00 a.m.
Seminar: 8:30 a.m. – 11:00 p.m.
Location: Embassy Suites by Hilton Monterey Bay Seaside, 1441 Canyon Del Rey, Seaside
Registration: $80 per attendee
Continental breakfast will be provided. Advance registration is required.
Register now: REGISTER NOW
If you have any questions, please call Jené K. Garcia at Fenton & Keller at (831) 373-1241.
Fenton & Keller 2025 Firm Updates | Winter 2025
A Seminar Focused on Your Future
Fenton & Keller’s highly anticipated New Year, New Laws 2026 Seminar is coming up on Jan. 29, 2026 — and preregistration is required.
Join experienced employment law attorneys Gladys Rodriguez-Morales and Brad Levang for a comprehensive overview of the new employment laws and workplace-compliance updates impacting California employers in 2026.
This essential annual seminar is designed for business owners, HR managers, payroll managers, and anyone navigating personnel issues in the year ahead.
- Date: Jan. 29, 2026
- Time: Registration 8:00–8:30 a.m.; Seminar 8:30–11:45 a.m.
- Location: Embassy Suites, Seaside, CA
- Cost: $80 per attendee
- Preregistration Required
Secure your seat today on Eventbrite
New Employer Notice and Record-Keeping Requirements in 2026
Question: As a small business owner, I get overwhelmed by all the different notice and record-keeping requirements that California law requires employers to follow. Are there any new requirements in 2026?
Answer: Yes, there are several new employer notice and record keeping requirements that become effective in 2026.
Fenton & Keller is Growing
Fenton & Keller is seeking dedicated professionals to join our team. We are currently accepting applications for the following positions:
- Land Use Administrative Assistant
- Office Assistant
- Associate Attorney –Litigation/Employment Law
- Litigation Administrative Assistant
Panetta Institute’s Jefferson-Lincoln Awards Dinner
Fenton & Keller was proud to be represented at the Panetta Institute’s Jefferson-Lincoln Awards Dinner, celebrating leadership, public service, and civic engagement in our community.
Top Row – Brian Call, Gladys Rodriguez-Morales and Derric Oliver
Bottom – Chris Nannini and Charles Keller
Thank you to the Panetta Institute for hosting an inspiring evening and for its ongoing commitment to educating and empowering future leaders.
New Year, New Laws in 2026
Question: Is it true that a lot of new laws were passed that will affect employers? What are the new laws, and when will they go into effect?
Answer: Yes. Beginning January 1, California employers will face a number of significant legal updates affecting wage and hour rules, hiring practices, leaves of absence, workplace safety, and more. Below is a summary of key legislative and regulatory changes that require immediate attention and potential policy revisions.
Paid Sick Leave
An employee may now take paid sick leave when they are a victim or a family member of a victim of a crime and require time off from work to attend judicial proceedings related to that crime, or to seek treatment or services related to the qualifying act of violence. Employees may also use paid sick leave when they are summoned for jury duty.
Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation
The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers from paying employees less than other employees because of gender, race, or ethnicity for the same work. The statute of limitations for the Equal Pay Act increased from two to three years from the last date the cause of action occurred and allows recovery to reach back as far as six (6) years.
Minimum Wage Increase
California’s minimum wage will increase to $16.90. The hourly increase also affects the annual salary of exempt employees, which will increase to $70,304. Employers should keep in mind that the minimum wage is different for some employees and employers should check if their city or county raised their local minimum wage.
New Annual Notice
Employers must distribute a new annual notice to their employees about several topics including: workers’ compensation; immigration protections, the right to engage in concerted activity and constitutional rights when interacting with law enforcement by February 1, 2026. Employers can find the template notice on the Labor Commissioner’s website in January 2026. Employers must keep record of their compliance with this notice requirement for three years.
Record Keeping
Employers must notify an employee’s designated emergency contact if the employee is arrested or detained on their worksite. An employer is only obligated to notify if the employee has designated an emergency contact specifically for this purpose and the employer has actual knowledge of the arrest. Employees should choose an emergency contact specifically for this purpose by March 30, 2026, or at the time of hire.
Employment Contracts
With limited exceptions, it will be illegal to include in an employment contract a term that requires the employee to repay a debt if the employee’s employment ends.
Wage and Hour Enforcement
California employers that fail to pay a final wage judgment within 180 days after the time to appeal expires may face a civil penalty up to three times the outstanding judgment, post-judgment interest, and be responsible for attorneys’ fees and costs in an action to enforce the judgment. Additionally, the Labor Commissioner may now investigate and issue a citation or file a civil action for gratuities taken in violation of Labor Code section 351, which prohibits employers from taking gratuities from employees or crediting the gratuities against the employee’s wages.
Employers are encouraged to conduct internal audits of their wage practices, employee classifications, handbook policies, and posting compliance to reduce risk. Employers with questions about these laws should contact their labor counsel.
NEW YEAR, NEW LAWS 2026
Join us for this informative and practical seminar designed to provide information and insight for business owners, HR managers, payroll managers, and anyone who handles personnel issues, about new employment laws and workplace-compliance issues in 2026.
Speakers
- Gladys Rodriguez Morales
- Brad Levang
Seminar Topics Include:
- “Stay-or-Pay” Employment Agreements
- New Rules on Artificial Intelligence in Hiring
- Family and Medical Leave Act Update
- Minimum Wage Increase
- New Notice and Record Keeping Requirements
- California’s Pay Scale and Equal Pay Act Updates
- Paid Sick Leave Update
When:
January 29th
Registration: 8:00 – 8:30 a.m.
Seminar: 8:30 – 11:45 a.m.
Where:
Embassy Suites in Seaside
1441 Canyon Del Rey Blvd, Seaside, CA 93955
$80 per attendee
Registration required - Click here to register now
Questions? Contact us:
Jené K. Garcia
Office Assistant
FENTON & KELLER
Post Office Box 791
Monterey, CA 93942-0791
831-373-1241, ext. 255
831-373-7219 (fax)
[email protected]
A Seminar Focused on Your Future
On Sept. 17, Fenton & Keller hosted a community seminar designed to empower individuals and families with the tools they need to navigate some of life’s most complex legal and financial decisions. Estate planning and long-term care are often thought of as distant concerns, but the truth is they affect nearly every family—and planning early can make all the difference.
During the seminar, our attorneys explored wealth-transfer tax strategies, explaining how thoughtful planning can reduce tax burdens, protect assets, and ensure family legacies are carried forward as intended. Attendees gained insight into both foundational planning tools—such as wills, trusts, and powers of attorney—as well as advanced strategies tailored to high-net-worth individuals and complex estates. The goal was to demonstrate how proactive planning minimizes surprises and maximizes peace of mind for future generations.
Another critical focus of the seminar was long-term care planning. The reality is that the cost of care continues to rise, and many families are unprepared for the financial and emotional challenges that come with it. Our attorneys addressed the common pitfalls people face with long-term care insurance policies—such as denied claims, delayed payments, or disputes over coverage—and shared strategies for protecting rights and securing benefits. By walking through real-world scenarios and case studies, the seminar highlighted not just the legal complexities, but also the human side of planning for one’s later years.
Importantly, the event underscored a theme that resonates across all of Fenton & Keller’s work: planning today brings security tomorrow. Attendees left with a deeper understanding of the steps they can take now—whether drafting key estate documents, updating existing plans, or reviewing long-term care policies—to safeguard their futures and the futures of their loved ones.
Seminars like this reflect our broader mission at Fenton & Keller: to provide clarity, compassion, and trusted counsel in moments that matter most. For over 70 years, we have partnered with clients across Monterey County and beyond to ensure they have the knowledge, strategies, and support they need to move forward with confidence.
Save the Date for Our New Year New Laws Seminar Thursday, Jan. 29th.
Considerations for Remote Workers
Question: I am interested in having a few of my non-exempt employees work remotely. Is there anything I should consider or implement before these employees start working remotely?
Answer: Yes. An employer considering a remote work arrangement should make the remote work opportunity available to other individuals in the same or similar roles. Employers who decide to allow remote work should consider implementing a written remote work policy or agreement to ensure that remote non-exempt employees comply with California wage and hour laws. Employers should also determine whether they will provide their remote employees with the necessary equipment to work remotely or indemnify them for their expenses. Finally, employers should consider setting expectations to ensure employees remain available and professional while working remotely.
A best practice for remote work is to establish and implement a written remote work policy or signed agreement that outlines the employee’s understanding and agreement to comply with these rules while working at home. California’s wage and hour laws apply to all employees in California, regardless of whether they work in the office or at home. Because of this, the written policy or agreement should require any hourly (non-exempt) employee to track all hours worked, to refrain from working off the clock, and to take their meal and rest periods. Despite being remote, employees should not be expected to perform tasks, respond to emails, or answer calls during their rest periods or when they are clocked out of work.
Another issue to consider is what equipment the remote employee will need to successfully perform their job duties. In general, it is a good practice to provide the employee with the equipment they need to perform their job. If this is not practical, the employer may reimburse the employee for the out-of-pocket expenses they incur related to their equipment. For example, if a remote employee needs to answer calls as part of their job, the employer may reimburse the employee for their use of a personal cell phone (rather than issuing the employee a company-sponsored cell phone).
There are reasons why an employer may require an employee to use an employer’s device rather than an employee’s device while working remotely. For example, an employer may require the use of the employer’s device to ensure that the data accessed remotely is not a security risk to proprietary information or is accessed in violation of professional standards such as HIPAA or client confidentiality obligations. If an employer decides to provide an employee with equipment, the remote work policy should include how the equipment should be used, how to maintain information confidentiality, and how the employee should return the equipment upon return to office work or separation.
Finally, the policy should outline the professional expectations for employees who work remotely. The employer can expect that remote employees have a designated work area, dress appropriately when appearing in meetings via video. The terms of the professional expectations will vary and depend on the employer’s industry and preferences.
If you are considering a remote work arrangement, or if you already have employees working remotely, you may wish to consult with your employment attorney to ensure the arrangement complies with the law and is set up to limit potential risks.
Leaves of Absence: What California Employers Need to Know
Leaves of Absence: What California Employers Need to Know
Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Location: Embassy Suites, Seaside, CA
Check-in: 8:30 a.m.
Seminar: 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Speakers: Elizabeth R. Leitzinger, Esq. and Marco A. Lucido, Esq.
Fenton & Keller invites you to attend an in-person employment law seminar focused on Leaves of Absence under California law. This presentation is designed for business owners, human resource professionals, payroll managers, and others responsible for personnel matters. The session will provide practical guidance on navigating the complexities of employee leave requirements and related employer responsibilities.
Topics will include:
- An overview of current leave laws applicable to California employers
- Common compliance challenges and how to avoid them
- Managing overlapping leave requests and return-to-work issues
- Additional timely updates affecting leave management in the workplace
Registration: $40 per attendee
Continental breakfast will be provided.
Advance registration is required. REGISTER NOW
To register, please visit: www.fentonkeller.com
If you have any questions, please call Fenton & Keller at (831) 373-1241.
This seminar is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. For legal guidance tailored to your specific situation, please contact our office directly.
FENTON & KELLER
2801 Monterey-Salinas Highway, Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 373-1241 | www.fentonkeller.com
The Employment Development Department’s Work Sharing Program
Question: I run a large warehouse with over 300 employees and business has been steadily decreasing for the last five months. I need to reduce my overhead, but I don’t want to lay off my staff because most of them are loyal, long-term employees. I have talked to my accountant, and they recommend I reduce my workforce by thirty percent immediately. Do I have another option?
Answer: Yes. An employer who do not want to lay off several employees may consider and apply for the Employment Development Department’s (“EDD”) Work Sharing Program. This program is an alternative to a mass layoff. In general, an employer may cut hours and wages while the EDD pays employees partial unemployment benefits.
The EDD Work Sharing Program was established in 1978 as the first of its kind in the nation. The program enables employers to cut business costs while retaining their trained workforce for when their business rebounds. This means that employees maintain their jobs and health insurance. The drawbacks of the program include increased unemployment insurance tax rates for employers and income reduction for employees. However, layoffs could produce the same tax implications for employers, and the program prevents complete job loss for employees. Mass layoffs could also require an employer to comply with the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (“WARN”) Act, and its California equivalent.
If an employer is interested in the program, the first step is to determine eligibility. To be eligible, an employer must: be a legally registered business in California; have at least ten percent of the employer’s regular workforce or a unit of the workforce be affected by a reduction in hours and wages; reduce the hours and wages by at least ten percent but not exceed sixty percent; provide the same health and retirement benefits as before, or meet the same standards as other employees who are not participating in work sharing; identify each participating employee in the application; and notify employees in advance of the intent to participate in the work sharing program. Other eligibility criteria can be found on the program’s website.
Second, the employer must apply for the program online or by mail. Once approved, the EDD requires that employers and employees “certify” eligibility with the EDD on a weekly basis online or by mail for continued partial unemployment payments. Certifying on a weekly basis provides the EDD with information on the hours worked and wages earned by the participant employees each week.
The work sharing plans are active for one year but can be renewed if the business is still eligible for the program. Payments by the EDD for partial unemployment benefits will end when employees are back to their regular work schedule or when employees have received all benefits available to them.
If an employer chooses layoffs instead of the work sharing program, the employer may be subject to the federal and California WARN Acts. These laws apply to covered employers who engage in a mass layoffs. Under these laws, covered employers must provide 60 days’ notice prior to the layoffs, and the notices must be provided to several individuals, including affected employees, the Local Workforce Development Board, and the chief elected official of each city and county governing where the layoffs occur.
Employers considering either the work sharing program or mass layoffs may wish to consult with their labor counsel to determine eligibility or compliance with the legal requirements.
New Year, New Workplace Laws: What Employers Need to Know in 2025
As 2025 begins, California employers face a number of significant legal updates affecting wage and hour rules, hiring practices, leaves of absence, workplace safety, and more. Below is a summary of key legislative and regulatory changes that require immediate attention and potential policy revisions.
Wage and Hour Updates
Minimum Wage: The California minimum wage increases to $16.50 per hour for all employers. However, local ordinances in over 40 cities and counties set higher rates (e.g., San Francisco at $18.67, San Jose at $17.95).
Exempt Employees: The new minimum annual salary for exempt employees is $68,640. Special minimums apply for computer professionals ($118,657.43/year) and physicians ($103.75/hour).
PAGA Reform: The Private Attorneys General Act has been significantly amended. Employees must have experienced the alleged violation to bring a claim, and employers may now “cure” certain violations to avoid litigation. Penalties may be reduced for employers who take “reasonable steps” to comply, such as conducting payroll audits or providing employee training.
Hiring Practices
Driver’s License Restrictions: Job postings may not require a driver’s license unless driving is a necessary job function, and alternative transportation is not feasible.
AI in Hiring: Employers using AI-based hiring tools should ensure compliance with federal and state anti-discrimination laws. Vendors should be transparent about algorithmic criteria and conduct regular audits.
Independent Contractors (SB 988): Written contracts are required for covered independent contractor relationships and must specify services, payment terms, and due dates. Failure to provide a written agreement may result in civil penalties.
Workplace Requirements
Workplace Violence Prevention: Effective July 1, 2024, most California employers must implement and train employees on a written Workplace Violence Prevention Plan. The plan must be accessible and include reporting procedures, hazard assessments, and post-incident protocols.
Indoor Heat Illness Prevention: Employers must adopt written plans for worksites where indoor temperatures reach 82°F or higher, provide cool-down areas, and monitor for symptoms of heat-related illness.
Leaves of Absence
Paid Family Leave (AB 2123): Employers may no longer require employees to use accrued vacation before accessing Paid Family Leave benefits.
Crime Victim Leave (AB 2499): Expands job-protected unpaid leave for employees and family members who are victims of qualifying acts of violence. Employers must provide written notice of rights beginning July 1, 2025.
Agricultural Worker Leave (SB 1105): Permits the use of paid sick leave during local or state emergencies due to smoke, heat, or flooding.
Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation Prevention
Intersectional Discrimination (SB 1137): Clarifies that California’s civil rights laws prohibit discrimination based on any combination of protected characteristics.
Captive Audience Ban (SB 399): Employers may not require employees to attend meetings that express views on religion, politics, or unionization. The law is currently being challenged in federal court.
Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: A new federal law expands employer obligations to accommodate pregnancy-related conditions, even if temporary or minor.
Posting Requirements
Updated notices are required in the following areas:
- Minimum wage increases
- Workers’ compensation rights (AB 1870)
- Whistleblower protections (AB 2299)
- Crime victim leave (AB 2499) – model notice available July 1, 2025
- I-9 Compliance
COVID-era flexibility has ended. All I-9 documents must be physically inspected within three business days of hire. Employers must retain forms securely, separate from personnel files, and comply with California’s unique pre- and post-inspection notice requirements.
We recommend employers conduct internal audits of their wage practices, employee classifications, handbook policies, and posting compliance to reduce risk. For questions or to schedule a compliance consultation, please contact our office.

