Question:

My company is considering adopting a paid time off policy, instead of separate sick leave and vacation. What are the pros and cons with regard to PTO policies? Is a PTO plan a better choice for my company?

Answer:

Employers have many different options when it comes to providing benefits for their employees. While employers are not required by law to provide employees with vacation, sick leave, or other paid time off, most employers choose to provide such benefits in order to attract and retain employees, and to recognize the value of their service.

Many employers provide their employees with paid vacation time that is typically earned throughout the calendar year according to the employee’s length of service. These same employers often also provide their employees with a separate sick leave benefit, so that employees can use paid time off when they are ill or need to care for a sick family member.

Because of the fundamental differences between vacation and sick leave in California, these types of policies must be administered separately. For example, it is unlawful in California to implement a “use it or lose it” vacation policy where your employees must forfeit any accrued but unused vacation time at the end of the year. This is because the California Labor Commissioner treats earned vacation as wages, which cannot be taken away from an employee once they are earned. However, employers are permitted to “cap” an employee’s vacation accrual at a reasonable, predetermined amount. Once the employee reaches the cap, he/she stops accruing additional vacation time until he/she uses some of that accrued vacation time and reduces it below the cap.

With regard to sick leave, an employer may require its employees to use their sick leave within the calendar year in which it is earned, without permitting any roll over. Similarly, while an employee must be paid at termination for any accrued but unused vacation that he/she has earned, an employer is not required to pay a departing employee for the value of any unused sick leave that he/she may have.

As you mentioned in your question, some employers instead choose to implement a paid time off (or “PTO”) plan for their employees. These types of plans provide employees with a certain number of days each year that may be used as the employee chooses for sick time, personal days, or vacation. This arrangement is often thought of as a “bank” of paid days off, from which employees may draw when they have a need for time away from work. PTO days are also typically earned based on the employee’s length of service with the company.

PTO policies are generally popular with employees because of the flexibility they provide, and because employees are not required to specify a reason for taking time off from work. Employees are also able to use all of their PTO days for whatever reason they choose, as opposed to being limited to a certain number of sick or vacation days. Many employers prefer PTO plans as well because there is less time required to administer such a program. This is because the employer is not required to track sick and vacation time separately, and likewise does not need to verify the reason for an employee’s absence.

There are some drawbacks to PTO plans, however. Some employers have encountered problems with employees using up all of their PTO for vacation, and then not having any accrued time remaining in the event that they become ill. In such instances, employers are faced with having to provide unpaid time off for employees who are unable to work due to illness. A related concern is that employees sometimes view all of their PTO time as vacation time, and are therefore not inclined to use their PTO days as sick leave. This can result in employees coming to work when they are ill because they do not want to use up PTO that they can later use for vacation purposes.

Also, because PTO may be used to take time off for any reason, the Labor Commissioner views all PTO days as vacation under the law. In other words, any days off that are “lumped in” with paid vacation are deemed to be vacation as well. This means that, at termination, an employee is entitled to be paid for all accrued but unused PTO days, whereas separate sick leave typically would not be compensable.

As you can see, there are benefits and downsides to providing your employees with a PTO plan. However, if you wish to give your employees greater control over their time off from work, this type of plan may be the right choice for you.
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Back to Menu- Work Place Law 2010 Articles